The conversation matters more than the booking. Handled as an accusation, a test request confirms your partner's worst reading of you. Handled as a way to end the doubt for both of you, it is often the first calm conversation a couple has had in weeks.
Here is what tends to work, based on the couples we see.
Before you raise it, decide which specific questions you need answered and what you will do with either outcome. Testing settles facts, not feelings — if the real issue is that you have stopped feeling safe, a test alone will not fix it.
Write the two or three questions down. If they are all vague or all about intentions, that is a sign the conversation you need is a different one.
Pick a private moment when neither of you is exhausted. Lead with the effect on you rather than the accusation: you cannot stop returning to it, you do not want to keep questioning them, and you want a way to draw a line.
Then make the ask concrete. A specific proposal — one test, questions agreed in advance, at home, about half an hour — is much easier to say yes to than a general demand to prove themselves.
Most resistance comes from imagining wires, a police interview room and a stranger judging them. Explain what actually happens: nothing is attached to the body, the test is eye-tracking on a screen, the examiner comes to you, they see every question in advance, and it takes around 30 minutes.
Be honest about accuracy too — 86-88%, high but not absolute. Overselling it invites a fight about the science later.
A refusal is information, not proof. Some people object on principle, some are humiliated at being asked, some are frightened of being wrongly flagged. Ask which it is and listen to the answer.
Sometimes a middle path works: agreeing the questions together first, or testing both of you rather than only one, which many couples find fairer and less accusatory.
The framing decides how the conversation goes. Anything that sounds like a trap or a threat — "if you've got nothing to hide" — puts the other person on the defensive and makes a genuine yes almost impossible. What works is naming your own state honestly and asking for help with it.
Something close to: "I can't switch this off and it's making me somebody I don't want to be. I'd like us to do a test so I can stop. I'll be in the room, I'm not going behind your back, and I'll take one too if you want." That gives the other person a role in fixing the problem rather than a charge to answer.
People decline for reasons that have nothing to do with guilt: resentment at being doubted, dislike of being examined, a feeling that agreeing sets a precedent for every future argument. Treating a no as a confession is a mistake, and pressing on until they cave produces a test taken under duress, which is worth very little to either of you.
A more useful response is to ask what they would be willing to do instead — full access to the account in question, a conversation with a counsellor present, a specific commitment about the contact that worried you. If nothing at all is on offer and the doubt is not survivable, that is a decision about the relationship, and it is one you are allowed to make without a test result.
Yes. Couples testing is common and often feels fairer. Each person is tested separately and privately.
Not in our experience. Where suspicion has already taken hold, a clear answer usually does less damage than months of unresolved doubt.
Only the person tested and the person who commissioned the test. We disclose nothing to anyone else.
Better not to. Arriving with a date already fixed feels like a trap. Find out what is involved, explain it, and book together once they have agreed.
Services · Pricing · How it works · Book a test · Contact